ANA M. NUNEZ
v.
YOSPA A. ABIN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment awarding property rights to Abin is affirmed because the appellant demonstrated no preliminary basis for reversal.
[1] Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), a court may summarily affirm an order on appeal when the appellant's initial brief demonstrates no preliminary basis f…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNunez and Abin were parties to a dispute over property rights. A jury trial was held in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, resulting in a final judgment…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Property Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 6, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-2010 Lower Tribunal No. 21-6457-CA-01 ________________ Ana M. Nunez, Appellant, vs. Yospa A. Abin, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge. Ana M. Nunez, in proper person. Trust Counsel, PL and Javier Penarredonda and Joshua Levine, for appellee. Before EMAS, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.
GORDO, J.
2 Ana M. Nunez (“Nunez”) appeals from a final judgment after a jury trial awarding property rights in favor of Yospa A. Abin (“Abin”). We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A). Having carefully reviewed the initial brief and record, we affirm on the authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a) (“After service of the initial brief[,] . . . the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated.”); Song v. Luo, No. 3D24-0494, 2025 WL 1944880, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA July 16, 2025). Affirmed.