LEE KERZNER
v.
VERONICA WELCH O/B/O A.R.K.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Trial courts have broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and appellate courts will not disturb such decisions absent a clear abuse of discretion.
[1] Trial courts possess broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and appellate courts will not disturb such decisions unless a clear abus…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLee Kerzner appealed three injunction-related orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County involving Veronica Welch and A.R.K.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Deference To Trial Court Findings cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 6, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D24-1134, 3D24-1135, 3D24-1136 Lower Tribunal Nos. 24-3440-FC-04, 24-3439-FC-04, 24-3212-FC-04 ________________ Lee Kerzner, Appellant, vs. Veronica Welch, et al., Appellee. Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del Rey, Judge. Louis C. Arslanian (Hollywood), for appellant. Clayton R. Kaeiser, P.A., and Clayton R. Kaeiser, for appellee. Before LINDSEY, LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692, 692–93 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“The trial court has broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, appellate courts will not disturb the trial court’s decision.“); Carricarte v. Carricarte, 961 So. 2d 1019, 1020 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“This is particularly true where the order relies on live testimony or other evidence that the trial court is singularly well-suited to evaluate.”) (quoting Smith v. Coalition to Reduce Class Size, 827 So. 2d 959, 961 (Fla. 2002)); Jeffries v. Jeffries, 133 So. 3d 1243, 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“It was the responsibility of the trial court to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve the conflicts in the evidence.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. Coal. TO Reduce Class Size & Pre-K Comm., 827 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2002)
- Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Carricarte v. Carricarte, 961 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
- Minervini v. Bankunited, 133 So. 3d 1243 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)