REGINAL M. HARDY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of mandamus may be denied without prejudice when the petitioner has not exhausted available administrative remedies.
[1] A petition for writ of mandamus may be denied without prejudice when the petitioner has not exhausted available administrative remedies, preserving the right to seek reli…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“affirming the denial of appellant's petition for writ of mandamus 'without prejudice to him exhausting his administrative remedies . . . and then seeking further relief in the appropriate circuit court if necessary'”
The court cited Finrock v. Fla. Civ. Commitment Ctr., 34 So. 3d 777, 778−79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) as the basis for its decision.
Reginal M. Hardy appealed a circuit court decision denying his petition for writ of mandamus in a case arising from Brevard County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-3321 LT Case No. 2012-CF-040227-A _____________________________ REGINAL M. HARDY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Kathryn Michele Speicher, Judge. Reginal M. Hardy, Cocoa, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. July 15, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Finrock v. Fla. Civ. Commitment Ctr., 34 So. 3d 777, 778−79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (affirming the denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus “without prejudice to him exhausting his administrative remedies . . . and then seeking further relief in the appropriate circuit court if necessary”).
2
JAY, C.J., and MAKAR and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.