ASTRID PERDOMO
v.
SANTIAGO J. TERAN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A person who affirmatively seeks to dissolve a garnishment writ has assented to the court's jurisdiction and is a party to the garnishment proceedings.
[1] A party who affirmatively seeks to dissolve a garnishment writ thereby assents to the court's jurisdiction and becomes a party to the garnishment proceedings.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the person, by affirmatively seeking to dissolve the writ, has assented to the court's jurisdiction over it and is a party to the garnishment proceedings.”
Court's reasoning citing Villamorey, S.A. v. BDT Invs., Inc., 245 So. 3d 909, 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
Astrid Perdomo appealed a non-final order from Miami-Dade County Court in a garnishment matter involving Santiago J. Teran.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Garnishment cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 18, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2077 Lower Tribunal No. 15-1006-SP-05 ________________
Astrid Perdomo, Appellant,
vs.
Santiago J. Teran, Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the County Court for Miami- Dade County, Luis Perez-Medina, Judge.
Astrid Perdomo, in proper person.
Santiago J. Teran, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Villamorey, S.A. v. BDT Invs., Inc., 245 So. 3d 909, 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“[T]he person, by affirmatively seeking to dissolve the writ, has assented to the court’s jurisdiction over it and is a party to the garnishment proceedings.”).