CHERYL KOSKI
v.
GM VAN LINES, INC.

Fla. 4th DCA | 2025-05-07
No. 2024-1609
McHugh, J., Klingensmith, C.J., Warner, J., Damoorgian, J.
2025 FL 3978 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A party must raise the same argument to the trial court that it seeks to raise on appeal in order to preserve the issue for appellate review.


Headnotes

[1] A party must raise the same argument to the trial court that it seeks to raise on appeal in order to preserve the issue for appellate review.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“In order to preserve the issue for appellate review, a party must have made the same argument to the trial court that it raises on appeal.”

Morrison v. State, 818 So. 2d 432, 446 (Fla. 2002), cited by the court for the preservation requirement.

Facts & Procedural History

Cheryl Koski appealed a judgment from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County against GM Van Lines, Inc.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Klingensmith

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHERYL KOSKI, Appellant,

v.

GM VAN LINES, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D2024-1609

[May 7, 2025]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Kathleen McHugh, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE23- 090765.

Cheryl Koski, Knoxville, TN, pro se.

Vincent O’Brien and Alice E. Solomon of O’Brien & Solomon, LLP, Pembroke Pines, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Morrison v. State, 818 So. 2d 432, 446 (Fla. 2002) (“In order to preserve the issue for appellate review, a party must have made the same argument to the trial court that it raises on appeal.”).

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw