JOSHUA E. BURGOS
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's conviction was affirmed because a rational trier of fact could find all elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt, jury instructions were within the trial court's discretion, and any prosecutorial comments were not properly preserved for review.
[1] A trial court's denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is reviewed under the rational trier of fact standard, requiring affirmance if a rational jury could lawfully…
[2] Trial judges possess wide discretion in decisions regarding jury instructions, and appellate courts will not reverse absent prejudicial error resulting in a miscarriage o…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Where 'a rational trier of fact could lawfully find that the evidence proved the existence of all the elements of the crime . . . beyond a reasonable doubt,' the appellate court should defer to the trial court's denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal.”
Standard for reviewing denial of motion for judgment of acquittal
Joshua E. Burgos was convicted in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of evidence, jury instructions, and prosecuto…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Beyond A Reasonable Doubt cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 28, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1083 Lower Tribunal No. F17-21050 ________________
Joshua E. Burgos, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ariana Fajardo Orshan, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Baxter v. State, 318 So. 3d 601, 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
2 (“Where ‘a rational trier of fact could lawfully find that the evidence proved the existence of all the elements of the crime . . . beyond a reasonable doubt,’ the appellate court should defer to the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal.” (quoting Sandhaus v. State, 200 So. 3d 112, 114 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016))); Senser v. State, 243 So. 3d 1003, 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (“Trial judges have wide discretion in decisions regarding jury instructions, and the appellate courts will not reverse a decision regarding an instruction in the absence of a prejudicial error that would result in a miscarriage of justice.” (quoting Lewis v. State, 693 So. 2d 1055, 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997))); Willoughby v. State, 296 So. 3d 574, 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (finding trial court’s erroneous inclusion of jury instruction on principals harmless because jury returned verdict including specific findings that defendant possessed and discharged firearm); Talley v. State, 260 So. 3d 562, 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“In order to preserve an allegedly improper prosecutorial comment for review, a defendant must object to the comment and move for a mistrial.” (quoting State v. Revenel, 184 So. 3d 629, 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016))).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lewis v. State, 693 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Sandhaus v. State, 200 So. 3d 112 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
- State v. Francique Revenel, 184 So. 3d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
- Joseph v. State, 243 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)