BENJAMIN BERNARD PEOPLES
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court does not abuse its discretion by denying a motion for mistrial when prosecutor comments during closing argument, though potentially improper, are not so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial or deny the defendant a fair trial.
[1] A motion for mistrial should be granted only where necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial, and prosecutor comments during closing argument do not wa…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A motion for mistrial should be granted only where necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.”
Standard for reviewing mistrial motions, citing Caraballo v. State, 39 So. 3d 1234, 1249 (Fla. 2010)
Peoples was convicted by jury of resisting a police officer without violence but acquitted of battery on a police officer and depriving an officer of …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Battery On A Law Enforcement Officer cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 14, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-0105 Lower Tribunal No. F22-11948 ________________
Benjamin Bernard Peoples, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Maria E. Lauredo, Chief Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, BOKOR, and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Appellant Benjamin Bernard Peoples appeals his conviction and sentence. The jury found him guilty of resisting a police officer without violence, but not guilty of battery on a police officer and depriving an officer of his means of protection. Peoples asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for mistrial for comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument. The comments concerned photographs taken from an officer’s body camera and introduced by the defense.
“A motion for mistrial should be granted only where necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.” Caraballo v. State, 39 So. 3d 1234, 1249 (Fla. 2010). After having reviewed the entirety of the record and the context of the closing argument, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Peoples’ motion for mistrial. The comments were not so prejudicial that it vitiated the entire trial or denied the accused a fair trial. Thomas v. State, 748 So. 2d 970, 980 (Fla. 1999); Buenoano v. State, 527 So. 2d 194, 198 (Fla. 1988). Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Thomas v. State, 748 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 1999)
- Judias v. Buenoano, 527 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1988)