JANELLE
v.
VETERANS VILLAS II HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., JANELLE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court errs in granting a preliminary injunction without including factual findings in support thereof and without addressing the bond requirement, conducting an evidentiary hearing thereon, or explaining reasons for waiving the bond.
[1] A trial court must include factual findings in support of a preliminary injunction and must address the bond requirement by either conducting an evidentiary hearing on th…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJanelle appealed from a nonfinal order granting a preliminary injunction against him in the homeowners association's action for temporary and permanen…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Injunctive Relief Standards cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
RODNEY W. JANELLE,
Appellant,
v.
VETERANS VILLAS II HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-0842
April 23, 2025
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Declan P. Mansfield, Judge.
Jawdet I. Rubaii of Jawdet I. Rubaii, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellant.
Tiffany M. Love of Adams and Reese, LLP, Tampa, for Appellee.
MORRIS, Judge.
Rodney W. Janelle appeals from a nonfinal order containing provisions granting a preliminary injunction against him in Veterans Villas II Homeowners Association, Inc.'s action for temporary and permanent injunctive relief. We conclude that the trial court erred by (1) failing to include factual findings in support of the injunction and (2) failing to address the issue of a bond and to conduct an evidentiary hearing thereon or to explain the reasons for waiving the bond
2
requirement.1 See generally Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610 (providing requirements for imposition of injunction); see also Phelan v. Trifactor Sols., LLC, 312 So. 3d 1036, 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (addressing need for factual findings and evidentiary hearing to address bond); cf. Layne & Brill, P.A. v. Brill, 453 So. 2d 890, 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (concluding in relevant part that trial court erred by entering injunction without factual findings and without providing for bond or setting forth reasons for waiving bond requirement). We therefore reverse the portions of the order that impose injunctive relief against Janelle and remand for further proceedings. We affirm the other portions of the order without further comment.2
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
ATKINSON and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
3
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Polyglycoat Corp. v. Hirsch Distribs., Inc., 442 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- The Econ. Dev. Corp. OF Dade Cnty., Inc. v. Merrett R. Stierheim, 782 F.2d 952 (11th Cir. 1986)
- Layne & Brill, P.A. v. Brill, 453 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)