AIDA AWAD
v.
SARAH DOYLE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues or review whether a trial court's judgment is supported by the evidence without a complete record of the trial proceedings.
[1] An appellate court cannot review whether a trial court's judgment is supported by the evidence or resolve factual disputes without a complete record of the trial proceedi…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court's rationale for affirming, citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)
Aida Awad appealed a judgment from Miami-Dade County Court. The appeal involved a dispute between Awad and Sarah Doyle.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 19, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1562 Lower Tribunal No. 24-42859-SP-24 ________________
Aida Awad, Appellant,
vs.
Sarah Doyle, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Stephanie Silver, Judge.
Aida Awad, in proper person.
Sarah Doyle, in proper person.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2 Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).