KAIYA PINEIRO
v.
OSCAR ARANO, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues or conclude that a trial court's judgment is unsupported by evidence without a complete record of the trial proceedings.
[1] An appellate court cannot review whether a trial court's judgment is supported by evidence or resolve underlying factual issues without a complete record of the trial pro…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
The court cited Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee to support the affirmance.
Kaiya Pineiro appealed a judgment from Miami-Dade County Court. The appeal involved a dispute between Pineiro and Oscar Arano and Moraima Arano.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 2, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0395 Lower Tribunal No. 23-157867 SP ________________
Kaiya Pineiro, Appellant,
vs.
Oscar Arano, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. Barket, Judge.
Kaiya Pineiro, in proper person.
Oscar Arano and Moraima Arano, in proper persons.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).