PIERRE LINE JOSEPH
v.
FRANKLIN ALLAN CALHOUN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order was affirmed because the appellant demonstrated no preliminary basis for reversal.
[1] A trial court order may be summarily affirmed on appeal when the appellant demonstrates no preliminary basis for reversal after service of the initial brief.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated”
Citation to Fla. R. App. P. 9.315 explaining the basis for summary affirmance
Pierre Line Joseph appealed from a circuit court order in Indian River County. The specific underlying facts are not detailed in this summary affirman…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
PIERRE LINE JOSEPH, Appellant,
v.
FRANKLIN ALLAN CALHOUN, Appellee.
No. 4D2024-1048
[September 11, 2024]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Hon. Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2023 CA 000125.
Pierre Line Joseph, Sebastian, pro se.
Bretton C. Albrecht of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315 (“After service of the initial brief in appeals under rule 9.110, 9.130, or 9.140 . . . the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated.”).
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.