JAMES TOUSSAINT
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time and will expire on different dates unless ordered to be coterminous.
[1] Concurrent sentences do not necessarily commence on the same date and will terminate on different dates unless the sentencing court expressly orders them to be coterminou…
[2] A claim for jail credit must be raised under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 and is untimely if filed more than one year after the sentence becomes final.
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be coterminous, they will expire on different dates.”
Court citing Eady v. State, 273 So. 3d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
James Toussaint appealed from a Circuit Court decision in Miami-Dade County involving two criminal cases (F18-13105A and F21-009880). The appeal conce…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Coterminous Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 4, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0059 Lower Tribunal Nos. F18-13105A, F21-009880 ________________
James Toussaint, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.
James Toussaint, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Eady v. State, 273 So. 3d 97, 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be coterminous, they will expire on different dates.”) (quoting Llerena v. State, 953 So. 2d 31, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)); Bryant v. State, 240 So. 3d 55, 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (explaining that “[a] claim for jail credit must be raised under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801” and, in citing to the rule, noting that such a claim is untimely if filed more than one year after the sentence becomes final).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Monroe v. State, 953 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Bryant v. State, 240 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
- Biscayne Marine P'rs v. City of Miami, 273 So. 3d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)