ALEX BROWN
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed because the record conclusively refutes the appellant's claims and no manifest injustice has been demonstrated.
“The defendant also challenges the trial court's summary denial of her motion to withdraw her plea. As the record before us conclusively refutes [defendant's] claim and [defendant] has failed to demonstrate that a manifest injustice has occurred, we affirm.”
Citation to Wendt v. State, 19 So. 3d 1024, 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), applied as precedent for the affirmance.
Alex Brown appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The specific facts underlying the appeal are not detailed in this per cur…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Manifest Injustice Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 4, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-0015 Lower Tribunal No. F19-1192A ________________
Alex Brown, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard Hersch, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Gabrielle M. Argimon, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, LOBREE, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See, e.g., Wendt v. State, 19 So. 3d 1024, 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“The defendant also challenges the trial court’s summary denial of her motion to withdraw her plea. As the record before us conclusively refutes [defendant’s] claim and [defendant] has failed to demonstrate that a manifest injustice has occurred, we affirm.”).