RAYMOND CLAUDIO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se petitioner whose repeated filings on the same claims are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous may be sanctioned by barring future pro se filings and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant by barring future pro se filings and referring the litigant to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings when the litigant's re…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRaymond Claudio, a pro se litigant, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the Fifth District Court of Appeal stemming from Putnam County Circuit Co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-0558 LT Case Nos. 2022-CF-1166 2022-CF-1179 _____________________________
RAYMOND CLAUDIO,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Elizabeth A. Morris, Respondent Judge.
Raymond Claudio, Lake City, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
August 30, 2024
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of mandamus stemming from Putnam County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2022-CF-1166 and 2022-CF-1179. Because it appears that Petitioner’s repeated motions and other filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case numbers may result in sanctions such as a bar
2 on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2024); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
JAY, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.