JIHAD KIRAN ELVY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's imposition of $100 for costs of prosecution is affirmed, but the case is remanded for entry of a proper revocation order specifying that the appellant violated conditions three and five of his probation.
[1] A probation revocation order must specify which conditions of probation were violated by the defendant.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJihad Kiran Elvy appealed from a circuit court decision imposing prosecution costs and entering a probation revocation order. The trial court imposed …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Costs Of Prosecution cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2023-3546 LT Case Nos. 2019-CF-4240-A 2021-CF-2752-A _____________________________
JIHAD KIRAN ELVY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Anthony M. Tatti, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Judson Searcy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
August 23, 2024
PER CURIAM.
In this criminal appeal, we affirm the trial court’s imposition of $100 for the costs of prosecution. See O’Malley v. State, 378 So. 3d 672, 673 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024); Parks v. State, 371 So. 3d 392, 393–94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023), review granted, No. SC2023-1355,
2 2024 WL 370043 (Fla. Jan. 31, 2024). However, based on the State’s concession, we remand with directions that the trial court enter a proper revocation order specifying that Appellant violated conditions three and five of his probation. See Collins v. State, 386 So. 3d 1057 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
MAKAR, JAY, and SOUD, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________