PRECIOUS EZEAMAMA
v.
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF CATHERINE EZEAMAMA CHIBUGO
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The death of a sole member does not immediately dissolve a single-member LLC; dissolution occurs only after 90 consecutive days without members and requires formal filing of articles of dissolution. Assets owned by an LLC are not estate assets because the LLC is a separate legal entity from its members.
[1] A single-member LLC is a separate legal entity distinct from its sole member, and assets owned by the LLC are not estate assets even if the decedent owned the LLC in its…
[2] The death of a sole member of an LLC causes dissociation under Florida Statutes section 605.0602(7)(a) but does not automatically dissolve the LLC.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the affairs of a corporation, even though substantially owned by a decedent, cannot be administered by decedent's executor as assets of the decedent's estate.”
Establishes the foundational principle that separate legal entities' assets are not estate assets regardless of the decedent's ownership percentage.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCatherine Ezeamama Chibugo died as the sole member of an LLC that owned real property encumbered by a mortgage. The estate's personal representative f…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May1, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________
No. 3D23-0855 Lower Tribunal No. 22-2976 ________________
Precious Ezeamama, Appellant,
vs.
In Re: The Estate of Catherine Ezeamama Chibugo, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.
Michael Van Cleve, Law, and Michael Van Cleve, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, LOBREE, and BOKOR, JJ.
LINDSEY, J.
Appellant Precious Ezeamama appeals an order denying her Motion to Determine Estate Assets in the underlying probate action.1 The trial court
I.
BACKGROUND
At the time of her death, the Decedent was the sole member of a Limited Liability Company (the “LLC”). After the Decedent’s passing, Richard B. Carmel Investments, LLC (the “Creditor”) filed a Statement of Claim against the Estate for the outstanding balance on a note and mortgage on property owned by the LLC. Precious Ezeamama, the Estate’s Personal Representative, filed a Motion to Determine Estate Assets seeking a determination that the real property was not an Estate asset. The Creditor did not file anything in opposition, and at the hearing, the Creditor’s representative stated that she was not objecting to the Personal Representative’s Motion. The probate court determined that the single-member LLC immediately dissolved upon the Decedent’s death and that the LLC’s assets were therefore Estate assets. The Personal Representative timely appealed.2
II.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
2 No Answer Brief has been filed.
III.
ANALYSIS
The issues before us on appeal are: (1) whether the property of the Decedent’s single-member LLC are assets of the Estate and (2) whether the LLC immediately dissolved upon the Decedent’s death.3 a. The Assets of the LLC Are Not Estate Assets. In Gettinger v. Gettinger, 165 So. 2d 757, 757 (Fla. 1964), the Florida Supreme Court held that “the affairs of a corporation, even though substantially owned by a decedent, cannot be administered by decedent’s executor as assets of the decedent’s estate.”4 The fact that the Decedent
3 The Personal Representative also presented this Court with issues related to the LLC winding up or being reinstated. These issues were not brought before the probate court. Therefore, we do not address them.
4 owned the LLC in full does not change this result. See BankAtlantic v. Estate of Glatzer, 61 So. 3d 1222, 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“In [Gettinger], the Supreme Court of Florida held that ‘the affairs of a corporation, even though substantially owned by a decedent, cannot be administered by decedent’s executor as assets of the decedent’s estate.’ In this case, ‘substantially’ is 100%, and the result is identical.”). Thus, assets owned by a single-member entity are not estate assets. See id. (“[T]he stock of the professional association is an asset of the Estate, but the funds of the professional association are a step removed from the Estate.”). b. The LLC Did Not Immediately Dissolve when the Decedent Died.
Though the death of an LLC member is an event causing dissociation, dissolution is not automatic; rather, the LLC must be formally dissolved. Section 605.0602(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2023), provides that “[a] person is dissociated as a member if . . . [t]he individual dies . . . .” Upon “[t]he passage of 90 consecutive days during which the company has no members” the LLC “is dissolved and its activities and affairs must be wound up . . . .” § 605.0701(3), Fla. Stat. (2023). Upon the occurrence of an event causing dissolution, set forth in section 605.0701(1)-(3), the LLC “shall deliver for filing articles of dissolution.” § 605.0707(1). Then, “the [LLC] shall cease conducting its business and shall continue solely for the purpose of winding up its affairs . . . .” § 605.0707(4).
5
Accordingly, when the Decedent died on March 23, 2023, she was dissociated from the LLC under section 605.0602(7)(a). Not until ninety days after she passed—well after the probate court’s April 6, 2023 denial of the Motion to Determine Assets—did it become an event causing dissolution under section 605.0701. Section 605.0707 then requires the LLC to be dissolved by filing articles of dissolution. Still, the LLC continues for certain purposes, such as winding up. Id.
IV.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the probate court erred as a matter of law in finding that the Decedent’s passing immediately dissolved the LLC. Therefore, we are compelled to reverse.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Borden v. East-European Ins. Co., 921 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2006)
- Aills v. Luciano Boemi, M.D., 29 So. 3d 1105 (Fla. 2010)
- Gettinger v. Gettinger, 165 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 1964)
- Bankatlantic v. Est. OF Richard Glatzer, 61 So. 3d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
- Erick A. Palma, M.D. v. S. Fla. Pulmonary & Critical Care, LLC, 307 So. 3d 860 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)