NASHID SABIR, ET AL.
v.
1560-1568 DREXEL AVENUE, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Without a record of trial proceedings, an appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues to determine whether the trial court's judgment is supported by the evidence or an alternative theory.
[1] An appellate court cannot properly review whether a trial court's judgment is supported by the evidence or an alternative theory without a complete record of the trial pr…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court [cannot] properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court's rationale for affirming, citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)
Nashid Sabir and others appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County against 1560-1568 Drexel Avenue, LLC.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 10, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-351 Lower Tribunal No. 21-22751 ________________
Nashid Sabir, et al., Appellants,
vs.
1560-1568 Drexel Avenue, LLC, Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes Simon, Judge.
BLU Ocean Law Group, P.A., and Nashid Sabir, for appellants.
Roniel Rodriguez, IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez IV, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court [cannot] properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).