MATTHEW MICHAEL ALBRITTON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on the controlling precedent of Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).
Matthew Michael Albritton appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MATTHEW MICHAEL ALBRITTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2022-2138
[January 17, 2024]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562022CF000547A.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).
MAY, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.