CAMILLE A. ABBOUD
v.
IRYNA R. ABBOUD
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se petition for certiorari filed nearly three years after entry of a final judgment is untimely and constitutes an abuse of the court's process when part of a pattern of repetitious and frivolous filings on the same issue.
[1] A pro se petition for certiorari filed nearly three years after entry of a final judgment is untimely and may be dismissed as an abuse of the appellate court's process wh…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Petitioner continues to file pleadings that are an attempt to revisit the same issues which are abusive, repetitive, malicious, frivolous, and an abuse of this Court's process.”
Court's assessment of the petitioner's pattern of filings and basis for warning of sanctions
Petitioner Camille A. Abboud filed a petition for certiorari review of a domestic violence injunction final judgment entered on November 7, 2022. This…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Court Process cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-2557 LT Case No. 2021-DR-001577
CAMILLE A. ABBOUD,
Petitioner,
V.
IRYNA R. ABBOUD,
Respondent.
Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Howard O. McGillin, Judge.
Camille A. Abboud, St. Johns, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
June 26, 2026
WALLIS, J.
Petitioner has previously filed fourteen pro se filings in this Court including the present petition (Case Nos. 5D2023-3383, 5D2023-3455, 5D2023-3463, 5D2023-3482, 5D2024-0799, 5D2024- 0831, 5D2024-2799,5D2024-3413, 5D2025-0061, 5D2025-1441, 5D2025-2557 (the instant petition), 5D2026-0608, 5D2026-0732, and 5D2026-0608). The instant petition is the fourth pro se filing
Petitioner has brought in this Court from the domestic violence injunction that was the subject of St. Johns County Case No. 2021- DR-1577 (5D2023-3455; 5D2025-1441; 5D2026-0732). The instant petition is untimely, having been filed almost three years after the subject Final Judgment was entered on November 7, 2022.
Additionally, our Court previously documented Petitioner's repetitious and frivolous pro se filings in a previous opinion. Abboud v. Abboud, 406 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025).
After reviewing Petitioner's Response to this Court's Order to Show Cause dated May 22, 2026, it is clear that Petitioner continues to file pleadings that are an attempt to revisit the same issues which are abusive, repetitive, malicious, frivolous, and an abuse of this Court's process. As such, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se pleadings filed in this Court asserting the claim raised in this case regarding St. Johns County Case No. 2021-DR- 1577 may result in Spencer Sanctions being imposed. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
JAY, C.J., and HARRIS, J., concur.
2