SHAUNE S. DINNALL
v.
WE MIDORA OWNER LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment against the pro se appellant was affirmed.
Shaune S. Dinnall, proceeding pro se, appealed a judgment entered by the trial court in Broward County against him in a dispute with WE Midora Owner L…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Representation cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
SHAUNE S. DINNALL, Appellant,
V.
WE MIDORA OWNER LLC, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2396 [June 10, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nina Weatherly Di Pietro, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062025CA007750AXXXCE.
Shaune S. Dinnall, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
No brief filed for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).
KUNTZ, C.J., LEVINE and SHAW, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.