BYRD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Any error in the trial court's sentencing of Byrd was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
[1] Any error in sentencing that is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt does not warrant reversal on appeal.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMarkeal Donvelt Byrd was sentenced by the trial court in Bay County. The appeal concerns the validity of that sentence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Releasee Reoffender Act cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2024-2053
MARKEAL DONVELT BYRD, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Shonna Y. Gay, Judge.
June 10, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See McGlaun v. State, 420 So. 3d 634, 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025) (“Since any error here is harmless, Appellant's HFO sentence is affirmed."); see also Hicks v. State, 422 So. 3d 607, 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025) (affirming sentence imposed under prison releasee reoffender statute when any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt).
LEWIS, ROWE, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.