DIGITALBRIDGE PARTNERS, III, LP AND DBP III SNOWBIRD BIDCO, LLC
v.
CARIACO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND CARIACO CONSULTING, INC., ET AL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's order denying a motion to intervene and transfer venue is affirmed when the appellants fail to raise meritorious issues on appeal.
Appellants HControl Corporation, DigitalBridge Partners III LP, and DBP III Snowbird Bidco LLC sought to intervene in and transfer a case involving Ca…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Consolidation Of Appeals cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
HCONTROL CORPORATION, DIGITALBRIDGE PARTNERS, III, LP, and DBP III SNOWBIRD BIDCO, LLC, Appellants,
V.
CARIACO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Florida Corporation, and CARIACO CONSULTING, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
Nos. 4D2025-1927 and 4D2025-1994
[June 3, 2026]
Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Bradley G. Harper, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502024CA011356XXXAMB.
Todd L. Wallen of Wallen | Kelley, Coral Gables, for appellant HControl Corporation.
Beverly A. Pohl of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Boca Raton, Kimberly Jordan Freedman and Mark Francis Raymond of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Miami, and Forrest Gregory Barnhart of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA, West Palm Beach, for appellants DigitalBridge Partners, III, LP, and DBP III Snowbird Bidco, LLC.
Alan Benjamin Rose and Carly Marissa Weiss of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants appeal an order denying a motion to intervene and transfer venue. We find the issues raised to be without merit and we affirm without further comment. This affirmance does not affect the stay imposed in the lower tribunal following our opinion in Digitalbridge Partners, III, LP v. Cariaco Technologies, Inc., 430 So. 3d 949 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The Palm Beach County proceedings remain stayed “pending further disposition of the related Miami-Dade County action.” Id. at 950.
Affirmed.
KUNTZ, C.J., LEVINE and SHAW, JJ., concur.
* * *