FAITH SCHMIDT
v.
ALLISON LENDING LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed.
[1] Appellate courts may sanction parties for submitting briefs generated by artificial intelligence that contain irrelevant arguments and citations to non-existent cases.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We once again warn against the filing of briefs generated by AI that include irrelevant arguments and cases that do not exist.”
The court's warning regarding AI-generated briefs submitted to the appellate court.
Faith Schmidt appealed a judgment entered against her by the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in St. Lucie County. Schmidt filed a br…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Frivolous Filings cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
FAITH SCHMIDT, Appellant,
V.
ALLISON LENDING LLC, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2488
[May 20, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Steven Joel Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562024CA001004AXXXHC.
Faith Schmidt, Fort Pierce, pro se.
Aamir Hayat Saeed, Rosenberg & Cummings PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). We once again warn against the filing of briefs generated by AI that include irrelevant arguments and cases that do not exist. We warn appellant and others filing documents in this Court that they may be sanctioned for similar conduct in the future. See, e.g., Goya v. Hayashida, 418 So. 3d 652, 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.