SHIRLEY MEARS DAVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel.
[1] A criminal defendant generally cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceShirley Mears Davis filed a petition for writ of prohibition in her pro se capacity while apparently represented by counsel in an underlying criminal …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Prohibition cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
SHIRLEY MEARS DAVIS, Petitioner,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
No. 1D2025-2929
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Proceedings.
May 6, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding that generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).
LEWIS, WINOKUR, and NEFF, JJ., concur.