NETTLES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A habeas corpus petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is subject to the standards established in Baker v. State.
[1] Claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in habeas corpus petitions are evaluated under the standards established in Baker v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTyi DeJesus Nettles filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the First District Court of Appeal, raising claims including ineffective assistance …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sixth Amendment Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
TYI DEJESUS NETTLES, Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
No. 1D2025-2904
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
May 6, 2026
PER CURIAM.
To the extent Petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, the Court denies the petition. In all other respects, the petition is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.