UPPAL
v.
LAS PALMAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, HADAD, ET AL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed.
Neelam Uppal, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of certiorari challenging a circuit court decision involving Las Palmas Condominium Associa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Foreclosure cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
NEELAM UPPAL, Petitioner,
V.
LAS PALMAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION; WISAM MOHAMMAD HADAD; YHL CAPITAL, LLC; JENNIFER ZIELINSKI; SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC; UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC., Respondents.
No. 2D2025-2440
April 22, 2026
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Rebecca L. Hamilton, Judge.
Neelam Uppal, pro se.
Jason Michael Azzarone of LaCava Jacobson & Goodis, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents Las Palmas Condominium Association and Sentry Management, Inc.
Charles Gallagher of Gallagher & Associates Law Firm, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Respondents Wisam Mohammad Hadad and YHL Capital,
LLC.
No Appearance for remaining Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed.
KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.