DALKEITH
v.
STATE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2019-01-23
No. 18-1333
Price Daniel
263 So. 3d 243 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Trespass in a conveyance is a second-degree misdemeanor under Florida Statutes §§ 810.08(1) & (2)(a), and clerical errors in judgment documents can be corrected without resentencing when the correction does not affect the defendant's sentence.


Headnotes

[1] A clerical scrivener's error in a judgment that does not affect a defendant's sentence may be corrected without conducting a new sentencing hearing, distinguishing such m…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“As counsel for the parties candidly admit that the error was a scrivener's error, not judicial error, which when corrected will not affect the defendant's sentence, the judgment may be corrected without conducting a new sentencing hearing.”

Court's explanation for affirming without resentencing despite the classification error

Facts & Procedural History

Morris Dalkeith was convicted of trespass in a conveyance in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court. The judgment mistakenly classified the offense as a firs…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Morris Dalkeith, appeals his conviction for trespass in a conveyance. We affirm, but remand for correction of the judgment to reflect that trespass in a conveyance is a second-degree misdemeanor, §§ 810.08(1) & (2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018), not a first-degree misdemeanor as listed in the judgment. As counsel for the parties candidly admit that the error was a scrivener’s error, not judicial error, which when corrected will not affect the defendant’s sentence, the judgment may be corrected without conducting a new sentencing hearing. Malone v. State, 225 So. 3d 335, 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw