JAMES WILLIAMS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's decision was affirmed based on controlling precedent from Johnson v. State and related cases establishing the legal standard applicable to the defendant's claims.
James Williams appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Judge Nancy Moate Ley.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Williams v. State, 129 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Sweet
v. State, 987 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2002); Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wiles v. State, 162 So. 3d 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…n, and it imposed fifteen-year mandatory minimum terms for the conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and trafficking in cocaine convictions. See § 893.135(l)(b)(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011). This court affirmed Wiles’ judgments and sentences. Wiles v. State, 129 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision). In ground one of his amended petition, Wiles alleges that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that his convictions for both conspiracy to commit racketeering and conspiracy to traffic in cocain…
-
Wiles v. State, 198 So. 3d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…[*925] ry minimum terms for the conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and trafficking in cocaine convictions. Id.; see also § 893.135(l)(b)(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011). After this court per curiam affirmed his convictions and sentences, see Wiles v. State, 129 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision), Wiles filed a petition pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d), alleging that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that his conspiracy convictions violated double jeopardy becau…
Authorities Cited
- Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)
- Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- McDONALD v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
- Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)
- Sweet v. State, 987 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)