ALSPAUGH

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Amos H. Miller and Doris Miller v. State, 170 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
  …cupancy of premises consistent with that relationship cannot, in the absence of evidence of knowing complicity, make one mate liable for the criminal activities of the other. Alspaugh v. State, Fla.App. (2nd) 1961, 133 So. 2d 587, cert. denied Fla., 139 So. 2d 693. Cf. Vostre v. State, 1940, 142 Fla. 366, 195 So. 151; West v. State, Ga.App.1946, 74 Ga.App. 453, 40 S.E. 2d 156; State v. Bazoukas, 1939, 226 Iowa 1385, 286 N.W. 458. Amos Miller’s conviction rests on somewhat firmer grounds, the possession of pr…
• Benny Richard Ellis and Lena Elizabeth Ellis v. State, 528 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
  …onsistent with that relationship cannot, in the absence of evidence of knowing complicity, make one mate liable for the criminal activities of the other. (Emphasis added). See also Alspaugh v. State, 133 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961), cert. denied, 139 So. 2d 693 (Fla.1962). We disagree with Lena Ellis’s argument in regard to the sufficiency of the evidence in regard to attempted trafficking. There was abundant evidence of her “knowing complicity” in that offense; indeed, she kept the key to the padlock on…

Authorities Cited

• Alspaugh v. State, 133 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)