STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
MICHAEL BARNES

Fla. 4th DCA | 2018-12-19
No. 17-3607
John Cornyn
259 So. 3d 884 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2018) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An order granting a criminal defendant's motion to vacate a plea is not an appealable order by the State under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1), and a petition for writ of certiorari challenging such an order must show a departure from the essential requirements of the law resulting in material injury.


Headnotes

[1] An order granting a criminal defendant's motion to vacate a plea is not among the orders that the State may directly appeal as of right under Florida Rule of Appellate Pr…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Michael Barnes obtained a circuit court order vacating his guilty plea in a criminal case in Broward County. The State attempted to appeal this order.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The state appeals the circuit court’s order granting a criminal defendant’s motion to vacate a plea. Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1), an order granting a defendant’s motion to vacate a plea is not among the orders that the state may appeal. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1988); State v. Stapleton, 764 So. 2d 886, 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We deny the petition for writ of certiorari for failure to show a departure from the essential requirements of the law resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case. GROSS, MAY, JJ., and CARACUZZO, CHERYL, Associate Judge, concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw