SAMUEL C. GOLDEN
v.
ESTATE OF HANS G. TANZLER, JR.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court reversibly errs when an incarcerated party requests telephonic appearance and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections directing the prisoner to appear telephonically.
[1] A trial court commits reversible error when an incarcerated party requests telephonic appearance and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corre…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a court reversibly errs when a prisoner requests to appear telephonically[] and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections requiring the prisoner to appear telephonically”
The court cited the holding from Burdoo v. Plympton, 219 So. 3d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
Samuel C. Golden, an incarcerated party, appealed a circuit court judgment in a dispute with the Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr. Golden requested to ap…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reversible Error cases and more on FLexlaw
December 10, 2018 PER CURIAM.
In Burdoo v. Plympton, this court held that “[a] court reversibly errs when a prisoner requests to appear telephonically[] and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections requiring the prisoner to appear telephonically.” 219 So. 3d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017); accord Havenner v. Hutchinson, 162 So. 3d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). In this case, that is what happened.
REVERSED. ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Samuel C. Golden, pro se, Appellant. Hans G. Tanzler, III, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., pro se, Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Havenner v. Debora Hutchinson, 162 So. 3d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
- Burdoo v. Plympton, 219 So. 3d 170 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)