AMERICAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE F. BLACKWELL ET UX., APPELLEES
AMERICAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
GEORGE F. BLACKWELL ET UX., APPELLEES
138 So. 2d 761
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
Reversed on the authority of American Land Development Corporation v. Hillman, Fla.App., 138 So.2d 756, Case No. 2657, filed this date.
SHANNON, C. J., and ALLEN and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Heddendorf v. Joyce, 178 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)…to grant defendant’s request to respond to such argument constituted reversible error.9 The cause is reversed with directions to grant a new trial. WHITE, Acting C. J., and ANDREWS, J., concur. . Hale v. Adams, Fla.App.1st, 1960, 117 So. 2d 524; 138 So. 2d 761 (1962); 147 So. 2d 165 (1962). . Ratner v. Arrington, Fla.App.3d, 1959, 111 So. 2d 82. . Perdue v. Watson, Fla.App.2d, 1962, 144 So. 2d 840. . Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Rentz & Little, 60 Fla. 449, 54 So. 20, 23, 1910. . 93 A.L.R.23 265 and the n…
-
Lee R. Hale and his wife v. Olvalene H. Adams, 147 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962)…m of plaintiff Lee R. Hale and stated the degree of negligence necessary to be established by him in order to recover under the facts alleged by that count. See Hale v. Adams, Fla.App., 117 So. 2d 524. On the second appeal (Hale v. Adams, Fla.App., 138 So. 2d 761), which was to review the trial court’s denial of plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint by striking all allegations thereof charging gross negligence, we rendered an opinion of reversal [*167] which contains language to the effect that the trial…1 / 2
-
Hodges v. Nofsinger, 183 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…uestion of the application of the Guest Statute is not involved in this case, or opinion, inasmuch as counsel for both parties agreed that the matter was controlled, in their opinion, by Hale v. Adams, Fla.App.1960, 117 So. 2d 524, rehearing denied 138 So. 2d 761. We therefore expressly refrain from expressing any view or comment on the applicability of the Guest Statute or of Hale v. Adams, supra. For the reasons stated, the judgment appealed from is therefore Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Am. Land Dev. Corp. v. Hillman, 138 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)