LUELLA MAXINE OWCA AND LEO W. OWCA, APPELLANTS,

v.

SIGMUND S. ZEMZICKI AND BETTY B. ZEMZICKI, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1962-02-07

No. 2102

SHANNON, C. J., and KANNER and WHITE, JJ., concur.

137 So. 2d 880 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1962) Positive Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See opinion styled, Owca v. Zemzicki, Case No. 2101, Fla.App., 137 So. 2d 876.

SHANNON, C. J., and KANNER and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Jones v. Wilson, 146 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)

…e correctness of the order on the petition for rehearing, this court would be required' to consider the final decree and the record' on which it was predicated. We have previously held that this cannot be done. See Taborsky v. Mathews, Fla.App.1962, 137 So. 2d 880; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 73. The decree sought to be appealed is neither a final decree nor an appealable interlocutory order. This appeal accordingly is dismissed ex mero motu. KANNER, Acting C. J., and WHITE and SMITH, JJ., co…
Windowmaster Corp. v. James A. Knowles, Inc., 193 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)

…grounds of improper venue. An interloctory appeal from an order denying a motion for rehearing does not bring up for appellate review the correctness of other interlocutory orders previously entered in the cause. Taborsky v. Mathews, Fla.App.1962, 137 So. 2d 880; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 73. No error having been demonstrated, we affirm. Notwithstanding this rule, we have examined the case on its merits and have determined that the order transferring the cause because of improper venue was…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw