KARLA LORRAINE WOOTEN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2018-09-26
No. 18-2058
254 So. 3d 351 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Karla Lorraine Wooten appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, proceeding pro se.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Karla Lorraine Wooten, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Smith v. State, 120 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Johnson v. Office of State Attorney, 987 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Francois v. State, 934 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw