MATTHEW PIRIE
v.
STATE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-09-24
No. 5D18-730
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

When a Rule 3.850 postconviction motion is determined to be facially insufficient and timely filed, the trial court must grant the defendant at least one opportunity to amend the motion within 60 days before entering summary denial.


Headnotes

[1] When a Rule 3.850 postconviction motion is timely filed but facially insufficient, the trial court must enter a nonfinal order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the motion.”

Citation to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2)

Facts & Procedural History

Matthew Pirie filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, which was summarily denied by the trial court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. Matthew Pirie appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal

Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. While the court properly determined that Pirie’s motion was facially insufficient, it should have given him at least one opportunity to amend. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2) (“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal,

nonappealable order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the motion.”); Spera v.

State, 971 So. 2d 754, 761-62 (Fla. 2007) (holding that trial court must give defendant one opportunity to amend facially deficient claims).

Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial and remand with directions that the court strike Pirie’s motion and grant him sixty days to file an amended motion if he can do so in good faith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw