JEREMY M. CARTER
v.
THE MARK I. GRUMET REVOCABLE TRUST
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court has no discretion to deny a plaintiff's first amendment to a complaint before a responsive pleading has been served.
[1] A party is entitled to amend a pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served, and a trial court has no discretion to deny such an…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A trial court has no discretion to deny a plaintiff's first amendment to a complaint before a responsive pleading has been served.”
Statement of applicable law in the court's reasoning
After two years of unsuccessful service attempts, the plaintiff resorted to service by publication. The trial court quashed the service by publication…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Right To Amend Complaint cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Appellant appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his complaint. He raises three issues on appeal, but we reverse on only one. Over the course of two years, appellant unsuccessfully tried to serve process on the defendants. Eventually, he resorted to service by publication, which the trial court quashed for being improper. The trial court then dismissed the complaint for failure to serve process despite appellant’s pending motion to amend his complaint. A trial court has no discretion to deny a plaintiff’s first amendment to a complaint before a responsive pleading has been served. Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So. 2d 561, 568 (Fla. 2005). Rather, a party is entitled to “amend a pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served . . . .” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(a). Because appellant had an absolute right to amend his complaint before a responsive pleading was served, the trial court erred in dismissing the
2
action. See Boca Burger, 912 So. 2d at 567. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to allow appellant to amend his complaint.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. TAYLOR, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.