REED CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
ARTHUR C. ZIMMERMAN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Reed Construction Corporation appeals a final decree awarding an employee wrongful discharge damages, stock repurchase obligations, and non-compete injunction. The appellate court affirms the wrongful discharge finding and stock repurchase requirement but reduces damages by mitigation credit for the employee's interim earnings and remands to set a deadline for stock repurchase.
The court affirmed that the employee was wrongfully discharged and that the employer must repurchase the stock. However, the court held that damages must be reduced by $750 in mitigation credit for income the employee earned during the relevant period, and remanded for the trial court to establish a specific deadline for the stock repurchase.
“There is ample evidence to support the chancellor's finding that the employee was wrongfully discharged, and the final decree in this regard will not be disturbed.”
Establishes that the court affirmed the core finding of wrongful discharge
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAn employment contract between Reed Construction Corporation and Arthur Zimmerman included a non-competing agreement and provisions regarding Zimmerma…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Interest On Damages cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant, defendant below, seeks reversal of a final decree rendered in favor of the appellee, plaintiff below, in an action for injunction, damages and other relief arising out of an employment contract. The effect of the final decree adjudicated that the appellee-employee had been wrongfully discharged and, therefore, was entitled to recover his compensation for the balance of the employment period; adjudicated that the appellant corporation, as the employer, was obligated to re-purchase 250 shares of the capital stock of the corporation owned by the employee, at a purchase price of $2,500.00, and enjoined the *580employee from violating a non-competing agreement which expires in 1962.
The appellant urges, among other things, that the appellant had a right to discharge the employee; that even if the employee was wrongfully discharged the employer was entitled to mitigation in the amount of damages awarded by virtue of income earned, and that a time limit should be established for the re-purchase of the stock.
There is ample evidence to support the chancellor’s finding that the employee was wrongfully discharged, and the final decree in this regard will not be disturbed.
After the employee was discharged, he was obligated to seek other employment that would not violate the restrictions of the non-competing agreement, which was a separate contract, and any sums of money earned during the period involved should mitigate or reduce the damages awarded in the form of salary that would have been earned over the balance of the term of employment. 35 Am.Jur., Master and Servant, § 57; 141 A.L.R. 670; 28 A.L.R. 747. The evidence before the chancellor was undisputed that during the period involved the employee earned $750.00, and this amount should mitigate or reduce the award for compensation to the employee.
The parties are in accord that the employee has tendered the return of the 250 shares of capital stock and that the corporation is willing to re-purchase same at the price of $2,500.00. The chancellor overlooked, in his final decree, fixing a time within which this purchase and exchange should take place.
The employee cross-assigned as error the failure to award interest on the compensatory damages. Interest, as such, was not sought by the complaint and was not called to the attention of the chancellor prior to the final decree. Moreover, the record fails to establish when the employee earned the $750.00, here ordered in mitigation; i. e., whether it was earned in the first or last month of employment period involved, all of which would be material in computing interest on the installments. Therefore, this point is not well taken.
The final decree is affirmed as to the award of compensatory damages, with directions to the chancellor to reduce the amount by the sum of $750.00 earned by the employee during the balance of the employment period, and to set a specific time within which the corporation shall purchase the capital stock held by the appellee.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Austin's Rack, Inc. v. Austin, 396 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…unnecessary to consider the company’s further point that the trial court failed to offset sums earned by Austin from employment since his discharge against amounts due him under the agreement, see, e. g., Reed Construction Corporation v. Zimmerman, 133 So. 2d 579 (Fla.3d DCA 1961). Reversed and remanded with directions to enter judgment for Austin’s Rack, Inc. . In Haiman, the court, reversing a judgment for the employee, held that it was not up to the jury to determine whether the failure of the employee…
-
Ballard v. EL Dorado Tire Co., 512 F.2d 901 (5th Cir. 1975)…esignation is the act that triggered the operation of the non-competition clause. . Nevertheless, a Florida court has indicated that a non-competition clause has the effect El Dorado attributes to it. See Reed Construction Corporation v. Zimmerman, 133 So. 2d 579, 580 (Fla.App.1961). In Reed, the employee had actually obtained other work, so the Issue of whether damages is mitigated by any type work where the work is not actually obtained was not at issue. . The District Judge made no specific finding on th…