THE CJS SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, D/B/A THE HCI GROUP
v.
MAXINE SIMMONS, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND GLOBAL ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An interlocutory order granting in part and denying in part a motion for summary judgment against one defendant is not immediately appealable when it does not dispose of a separate and distinct cause of action independent of other pleaded claims.
[1] An interlocutory order disposing of a motion for summary judgment is not immediately appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k) unless it disposes of a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCJS Solutions Group appealed orders granting in part and denying in part motions for summary judgment against two defendants, Maxine Simmons and Globa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Separate And Distinct Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw
June 28, 2018 PER CURIAM.
The Court has determined that as to Appellee Maxine Simmons, the order on appeal is not “one that disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims.” Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). Accordingly, the motion, filed on May 10, 2018, is granted and the appeal is dismissed with respect to the order granting in part and denying in part Simmons’ motion for summary judgment.
We note that the February 27, 2018, Final Summary Judgment in Favor of Global Information Technology Resources, Inc., is a partial final judgment disposing of the entire case as to Appellee Global Information Technology Resources, Inc., and is subject to immediate appellate review. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). The appeal shall proceed from that order. ROWE, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Kenneth A. Tomchin and Brett P. Abner of Tomchin & Odom, P.A., Jacksonville; Joshua A. Cossey, Jacksonville, for Appellant. T. A. Delegal, III, and James C. Poindexter of Delegal Law Offices, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee Maxine Simmons. No appearance for Appellee Global Information Technology Resources, Inc.