TOM H. PARKS
v.
STATE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-06-25
No. 5D18-1557
Zambrano, J., Torpy, J., Wallis, J., Lambert, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Department of Corrections' forfeiture of gain time cannot be countermanded by the court, but neither can that forfeiture thwart the plea bargain.


Headnotes

[1] While the Department of Corrections' forfeiture of gain time cannot be countermanded by the court, such forfeiture cannot operate to thwart a defendant's plea bargain.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The DOC's forfeiture of the gain time cannot be countermanded by the court, but neither can that forfeiture thwart the plea bargain.”

Court's statement of the governing legal principle regarding gain-time forfeiture and plea bargains, citing Dellahoy v. State.

Facts & Procedural History

Tom H. Parks filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in Case No. 2017-100954-CFDL, claiming that the Departm…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order entered by the circuit court in Case No. 2017-100954-CFDL denying Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief filed in that case, albeit not for the reasons provided by the court. We do so without prejudice to Appellant timely raising in Case No. 2007-000909-CFAWS his instant claim that the forfeiture of gain time by the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) thwarted his plea bargain, as that appears to be the case so affected by the forfeiture. See Dellahoy v. State, 816 So. 2d 1253, 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (“The DOC’s forfeiture of the gain time cannot be countermanded by the court, but neither can that forfeiture thwart the plea bargain.”).

AFFIRMED, without prejudice.

TORPY, WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw