MARCUS UPSHAW
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A scoresheet that improperly uses a prior offense as the primary offense results in an illegal sentence that must be vacated and corrected on remand.
[1] A sentencing scoresheet that improperly designates a prior offense as the primary offense results in an unlawful sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum penalty and m…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn June 2015, Marcus Upshaw entered a nolo contendere plea to felony petit theft and was sentenced to six years in prison. The trial court's scoreshee…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Petit Theft cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Marcus Upshaw appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The State properly concedes that one of the issues raised by Upshaw has merit.
In June 2015, Upshaw entered a nolo contendere plea on Count I in case number
2014-CF-002517 to felony petit theft, a third-degree felony. Upshaw was sentenced to six years in prison on that count, the lowest permissible sentence as reflected on his scoresheet. However, as the State acknowledges, the scoresheet was erroneous because it improperly used Upshaw’s 2010 aggravated assault with a deadly weapon conviction as the primary offense, rather than as a prior offense. Because a properly calculated scoresheet would yield a lowest permissible sentence on this charge of less than five years, the trial court was precluded from imposing a sentence greater than the five-year statutory maximum. Accordingly, on remand, the trial court is directed to vacate the sentence imposed on Upshaw’s felony petit theft conviction in case number 2014-CF-002517 and to resentence him. We find the other issues raised by Upshaw to be without merit.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J. and ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.