SKORCZ
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A foreclosure judgment shall be reversed and the case remanded when the defendant bank confesses error in the proceedings.
[1] A party's confession of error in an appellate proceeding may serve as grounds for reversal and remand, and the prevailing party may recover reasonable attorney's fees for…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWells Fargo Bank obtained a final judgment of foreclosure against Skorcz on July 27, 2017. The appellant subsequently moved for attorney's fees on app…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney'S Fees On Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Confession of Error, we reverse the trial court’s July 27, 2017 Final Judgment of Foreclosure and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings. Appellant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, filed September 19, 2017, is provisionally granted should Appellant ultimately be determined to be the prevailing party below. If so determined, the lower court shall determine and assess reasonable attorney’s fees for this appellate court proceeding. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(a), (b).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
WALLIS, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.