GLASCO
v.
REEMPLOYMENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-05-07
No. 5D17-2253
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The referee's disqualification of the appellant from reemployment assistance benefits was affirmed, but the court remanded for correction of the disqualification period's dates and formula.


Headnotes

[1] A disqualification from reemployment assistance benefits shall commence the week of actual discharge and continue for five weeks and until the claimant has earned sevente…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Rita Glasco was discharged from employment on January 5, 2017, and the referee disqualified her from receiving reemployment assistance benefits. Howev…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Rita Glasco (Appellant) appeals the referee’s decision disqualifying her from receiving reemployment assistance benefits. We affirm the decision under review but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The referee’s decision currently disqualifies

Appellant for the week beginning May 1, 2016, the following five weeks, and until

Appellant earns seventeen times the weekly benefit amount ($4675). This is incorrect as

Appellant was not discharged until January 5, 2017. The proper disqualification timeframe is the week beginning January 1, 2017, the following five weeks, and until

Appellant has earned $4675. See § 443.101(1)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2017). We therefore remand for the Commission to make this correction.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of a scrivener’s error. BERGER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw