ALVIN SHARPE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-04-20
No. 17-5330
243 So. 3d 525 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An alleged defect in an information that purportedly deprives a defendant of due process notice of a potential enhanced sentence does not result in an illegal sentence subject to correction under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).


Headnotes

[1] An alleged defect in a criminal information that fails to provide notice of potential enhanced sentencing does not constitute an illegal sentence subject to correction un…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“alleged defect in information, which purportedly deprived defendant of his due process right to notice of potential enhanced sentence, did not result in an 'illegal sentence' subject to correction under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)”

Court's reasoning for affirmance, citing Martinez v. State

Facts & Procedural History

Alvin Sharpe appealed a trial court decision regarding a claim that the information was defective because it failed to provide adequate notice of pote…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

April 20, 2018 PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Martinez v. State, 211 So. 3d 989, 992 (Fla. 2017) (holding that alleged defect in information, which purportedly deprived defendant of his due process right to notice of potential enhanced sentence, did not result in an “illegal sentence” subject to correction under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)).

ROWE, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

2

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw