REPUBLIC OF CUBA AND BANCO NACIONAL DE CUBA, PETITIONERS,
v.
ALEXANDER S. RITTER, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal denied a petition for common-law certiorari, finding that the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the trial court acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction. The appeal was initially filed improperly as an interlocutory appeal in a common-law action.
No, the petitioners failed to carry the burden of demonstrating that the trial court acted without and in excess of its jurisdiction or that its rulings did not conform to the essential requirements of law.
“This is an appeal which sought to review certain interlocutory rulings in an action at law. The appeal was improvidently filed because interlocutory appeals in common-law actions are limited to those orders relating to venue or jurisdiction over the person.”
Establishes the nature of the appeal and why it was improperly filed.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Republic of Cuba and Banco Nacional de Cuba filed an appeal seeking to review interlocutory rulings in a common-law action. The appeal was filed i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Common Law Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal which sought to review certain interlocutory rulings in an action at law. The appeal was improvidently filed because interlocutory appeals in common-law actions are limited to those orders relating to venue or jurisdiction over *99the person.1 As authorized by statute,2 we have treated the notice of appeal as a petition for common-law certiorari. See Ludwig v. Cochran, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 484; Kautzman v. Bandler, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 256.
The burden of clearly demonstrating that the trial court has acted without and in excess of its jurisdiction or its rulings do not conform to the essential requirements of the law is upon the petitioners. They have failed to carry this burden and by reason thereof, the petition for certiorari should be and it is hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
Norton, c. j., carroll, chas., J., slnd SMITH, D. R., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stein v. Bayfront Med. Ctr., Inc., 287 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)…e order. The appellant has failed to show that the order entered in this case was without or in excess of the trial court’s jurisdiction or constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law. See Republic of Cuba v. Ritter, Fla.App.1961, 130 So. 2d 98. The petition for certiorari is denied. MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.…
-
Danluck v. Lotspeich Co. & J. W. Lotspeich, 334 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…y. Likewise, the burden is on the petitioner to establish any abuse of discretion by the trial court that is relied upon for quashal of its rulings. See, e. g., Collier v. Homestead, Fla.1955, 81 So. 2d 201; Republic of Cuba v. Ritter, Fla.App.1961, 130 So. 2d 98, and 5 Fla.Jur., Certiorari § 27. In our opinion, petitioner has failed to show any grounds for quashal of the order here under review, except as to Paragraphs 3 and 6 thereof appointing an arbitrator and specifying his duties. The trial court has…
-
Republic of Cuba v. Ritter, 135 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1961)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 130 So. 2d 98.…
Authorities Cited
- Kautzman v. Bandler, 118 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)
- Ludwig v. Cochran, 114 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)