OZZLE NEGRON, PETITIONER,
v.
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1961-05-10
No. 30897
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
130 So. 2d 65 Florida Supreme Court (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It appears that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed herein does not make a prima facie showing that the prisoner is entitled to be discharged from custody. Accordingly, the petition is denied but without prejudice to the person detained to file a new or amended petition conforming to Section 79.01, F.S.A., and clearly showing by affidavit or other evidence that the petitioner was an unmarried minor at the time of his trial and that the provisions of Section 932.38, F.S.A., were not complied with in his case.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Silver Sand Co. OF Leesburg, Inc. v. Dep't OF Revenue, 365 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
    …aw justifies the result reached by the Department. In support of its contention that NCJ justifiably relied on the tax exemption certificate signed by Silver Sand and is relieved from the tax liability, the Department cited Motorola, Inc. v. Green, 130 So. 2d 65 (Fla.1961) which states: “ * * * if a dealer is delivered a resale certificate properly identified by the Comptroller’s registration number, and he receives it in good faith, he can proceed to deal with the purchaser. He can assume that he has ther…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw