CARLOS ALVERTO HERNANDEZ
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Where the State concedes sentencing error, the court remands to correct discrepancies between oral and written sentences and vacates convictions where appropriate.
[1] When the State concedes sentencing error, a trial court's written sentence must be corrected to accurately reflect the oral pronouncement of sentence.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHernandez was convicted of reckless driving (count three) and other offenses (counts four and five). Sentencing documents contained discrepancies betw…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. The State concedes error as to the sentencing issues that arose in this case. As to the reckless driving conviction in count three, this cause is remanded to the trial court to correct the written sentence to accurately reflect the oral pronouncement of sentence by the trial court. The convictions for counts four and five are vacated. All other issues are affirmed. Affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. CIKLIN, CONNER, JJ., and ROBERTS, KATHLEEN, Associate Judge, concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.