RICHARD ALBERT ROBERTS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2018-04-04
No. 15-3499
239 So. 3d 1289 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2018) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A sexual predator designation under Florida law cannot be imposed for offenses committed prior to October 1, 1993.


Headnotes

[1] A sexual predator designation under the Florida Sexual Predators Act is only applicable to offenses committed on or after October 1, 1993.

[2] A sexual predator designation imposed for an offense committed prior to October 1, 1993, constitutes error.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Because [the defendant's] offenses were committed prior to October 1, 1993, we conclude that he did not meet the criteria for a sexual predator designation.”

Wade v. State, 728 So. 2d 284, 285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)

Facts & Procedural History

Roberts was convicted by jury of capital sexual battery. The felony information charged that the offense occurred approximately a decade before Octobe…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RICHARD ALBERT ROBERTS, ) DOC #C09992, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-3499 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge.

Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BADALAMENTI, Judge.

Richard Albert Roberts appeals his jury conviction for capital sexual battery and the resulting life sentence and sexual predator designation imposed by the trial court. Roberts contends that the trial court erred by designating him a sexual predator pursuant to the Florida Sexual Predators Act.1 See § 775.21(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). Here, the felony information charges that the offense occurred approximately a decade prior to October

1, 1993. The trial court nevertheless designated Roberts a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21 in a written order dated July1, 2015, and indicated the same in

Roberts's judgment.2

State, 728 So. 2d 284, 285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) ("Because [the defendant's] offenses were committed prior to October1, 1993, we conclude that he did not meet the criteria for a sexual predator designation."), receded from on other grounds by King v. State,

911 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); see also Dennis v. State, 32 So. 3d 79, 80 (Fla. 2d

DCA 2009).

On remand, the trial court shall strike Roberts's sexual predator designation imposed for the conviction in this case and enter an amended judgment omitting this designation. See Dennis, 32 So. 3d at 81; Wade, 728 So. 2d at 285. We affirm his conviction and resulting life sentence in all other respects.3

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.

1See ch. 93-277, § 1, at 2621, Laws of Fla. 2Prior to filing his initial brief in this appeal, Roberts timely filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motion, requesting that the trial court correct his sentence by removing the sexual predator designation. Because the trial court failed to rule on this motion within sixty days, the motion was deemed denied by the trial court. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B).

3We have carefully reviewed all arguments raised by Roberts in this appeal. We reject his remaining arguments without comment.

NORTHCUTT and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Footnotes
1 After careful review and the benefit of oral argument, we accept the State's concession that the sexual predator designation was error and reverse that portion of Roberts's sentence. The sexual predator designation applies to an offense committed on or after October 1, 1993.
2 As the State properly concedes, this was error. See Wade v.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw