BERLIN CHARLES TASH, APPELLANT,

v.

PATRICIA ANN TASH, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Harris, 136 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1962)
  …65; Arnold v. State, Fla.1955, 83 So. 2d 105; and Jalbert v. State, Fla.1957, 95 So. 2d 589. In addition to these cases, all emanating from the Supreme Court of Florida, the District Court of Appeal, First District, in Helms v. State, Fla.App.1961, 128 So. 2d 756, a case almost identical to the one now under consideration, found that the evidence was not sufficient to support the charge in the information, which was laid under Sec. 832.05(3), but that it was sufficient to sustain a conviction under Sec. 832.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Strickland v. State, 559 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …be available. They were not. In order to sustain a felony charge of obtaining property or services by worthless check, it must be demonstrated that the check was the inducement for the furnishing of goods or services to the issuer. Helms v. State, 128 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961). A worthless check tendered for payment of a pre-existing debt will sustain only the lesser misdemeanor proscribed by section 832.05(2), Florida Statutes (1989). State v. Harris, 136 So. 2d 633 (Fla.1962); Laytner v. State, 239 S…
• McCORMICK v. State, 161 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
  …es or things of value by means of a worthless check). In support of this argument appellant cites, inter alia, Harris v. State, Fla.App. 1960, 123 So. 2d 752, modified on cert. Fla., 136 So. 2d 633, 91 A.L.R.2d 1088 and Helms v. State, Fla.App.1961, 128 So. 2d 756. In each of these cases conviction for violation of Fla.Stat. § 832.05(3), F.S.A., was reversed when the evidence indicated that the check was delivered in satisfaction of a pre-exist-ing obligation. In neither case did the existing obligation arise…