NARCISSUS SHIPPING CORP.
v.
ARMADA REEFERS, LTD.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
District court amended its judgment to reflect apportionment of fault among parties in a maritime shipping dispute, granting defendants' motion to amend while declining to alter findings of fact or conclusions of law.
The court amended its judgment to allow recovery on each party's claims to reflect the court's apportionment of fault.
[1] A court may amend a judgment to reflect apportionment of fault among parties without altering the underlying findings of fact or conclusions of law.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis case involved a dispute among Narcissus Shipping Corporation, Looza N.V., Juice Bowl Products, Inc., and Armada Reefers, Ltd. regarding liability…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Amendment Of Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
G. KENDALL SHARP, District Judge.
This case is presently before the court on a motion to amend the court’s final order and accompanying judgment entered on January 8, 1997 and January 13, 1997 respectively. The motion, along with its supporting legal memorandum, was filed by defendants Looza N.V. and Juice Bowl Products, Inc., and was further supported through a legal memorandum filed by defendant Armada Reefers, Ltd. Plaintiff Narcissus Shipping Corporation opposed the motion to amend, and offered proposed amendments of its own.
Having reviewed the subject order and the legal argument of counsel, the court has amended its order to allow the recovery on each of the parties’ various claims to reflect the court’s apportionment of fault. The *1384 court declines to alter its findings of fact or conclusions of law in any other respect. A copy of the court’s original order with the stated amendments is attached hereto as an appendix and is fully incorporated herein by reference, to constitute the court’s amended order. Thus, to the extent stated herein the court GRANTS the motion to amend (Doc. 191) filed by defendants Looza N.V. and Juice Bowl Products, Inc., and directs the clerk of the court to enter an amended judgment consistent with this amended order.