TIFFINY ROUSEY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment against Tiffiny Rousey, applying established precedent regarding appellate review standards.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on applicable precedent.
Tiffiny Rousey appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Polk County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge. Tiffiny Rousey, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Brown v. State, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Toomer v. State, 895 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Teart v. State, 866 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Sherwood v. State, 745 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Stovall v. Sergeant William Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Sherwood v. State, 745 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- Toomer v. State, 895 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
- Grant v. State, 866 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)